In history, Time’s depth is always problematic because it is based on sociological pace. While Smart History, due to embedded Chronostrategy, examines in a normal manner the interrelations between facts that are in a long temporal distance. In this manner it can find not only analogies, but even temporal isomorphs. This way it can study a voting of 1933 with a referendum of 2017, because very simply they have the same strategic substrate and the same traces of barbarity. Perhaps of course the societies of those eras say that they didn’t know the consequences of these results, but smart history doesn’t look if masses see, but how these are manipulated, because they know deep mental schemata that cross the eras because of the choice of common targets. So smart education doesn’t identify only tools of propaganda, but also characteristic behaviors of the Nations, which do not have direct dependence in a specific era. The different approach is more effective so that it distinguishes the indications, where others see only details due to lack of analysis and synthesis of the data and the facts. So it constitutes a tool which sees the future, when it looks at the past and foresees the moves, before they become acts, so that it gives the capability of intervention.