All of Greece’s serviles and hypengyophobics have got us all fed up about the magnitude of Turkey, as if the fat argument is the only one which could justify the despicable.
Only that even this is wrong.
Turkey is only big, as far as Greece and Cyprus are concerned, where the Stockholm syndrome appears to be applicable, and it’s logical that the hostages of an historic violation would consider in a friendly manner, the one who has violated all of their human rights.
In actual fact, Turkey seems enormous only when you yourself feel small and when you are observing her from the sea.
Because, from the eastern side is quite clear that it’s small.
Not only because it’s situated arbitrarily in places which don’t belong to her, because they constitute the homelands of the Armenians and the Kurds, but also because the countries in the region are really of another magnitude, and we aren’t only referring to Russia of course.
If we take into account, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Kazakhstan, India, Mongolia and China, the difference is huge to say the least.
To try and realize it, even Pakistan is bigger than Turkey.
So about which big country are we talking about here in Greece?
We objectively conclude, that the size depends upon the observer and his own range.
So let’s leave the serviles and the hypengyophobics aside, without letting them affecting us with their phobias, and let us deal with geostrategy, in order to see that Turkey’s problems are located in the east, and that it’s right there that she will be losing territories, whereas at her west, she speaks with an amount of grandstanding , because it has good audience and nothing else.