When everyone is trying to present the negotiations positively, for which by the way, we have no concrete information, they always forget to consider what the intentions of the invader are, especially under the circumstances in the Middle East.
Besides those in Cyprus, is there anyone who assumes that the glance, or the Asia Minor aspirations have changed in the least, when we analyze what’s happening in Syria?
Are there any Kurds or Assyrians who notice some difference, which could have a positive impact on solving the Cypriot problem?
Because we give the impression that there are simply friendly discussions which are taking place, and which incidentally we also refer to as negotiations.
Whereas in actual fact, what is the real change in the attitude of the invader, in regards to the territory, to the refugee and or the property issues?
In fact the only difference is this: the invader sees that the developments in regards to the natural gas through the Cypriot EEZ, is only for the benefit of Cyprus, therefore, something must be seen that is happening during the negotiations.